Comparing AI software development and non-AI software development

Large language models like ChatGPT and Google Bard have garnered much hype in the last year, with good reason. These models can generate creative text, answer queries, and perform tasks that previously required human intelligence. They can also suggest code snippets, troubleshoot errors, and streamline the coding process. In other words, they can accelerate project timelines.

‍

However, despite the hype surrounding these models, AI-assisted software development isn't as groundbreaking as it may seem on the surface. Software developers have been using AI to support their projects for many years now, typically in the form of workflow automations, code completion software, and low-code platforms. 

‍

Still, with these tools becoming more accessible and widespread, many companies are left wondering whether AI software development or non-AI software development is the way to go. It's a complex question with an equally complex answer, so let's get into it. 

‍

What can AI do in software development and programming?

Many things. Perhaps the one that gets the most attention is AI-assisted code writing and refactoring. Here, AI augments the coding process through features like code suggestion, error detection, and automated refactoring. AI models trained on vast codebases can suggest code snippets, detect anomalies or bugs, and propose optimal coding structures as developers write code in real-time. It can also provide real-time feedback and suggest improvements, thus speeding up the code-writing process, reducing errors, and enhancing code quality.

‍

However, AI-assisted code writing isn't just about speeding up the coding process; it's about elevating the developer's capability to create more efficient, robust, and clean code with less effort and time. It's about eliminating the mundane aspects of coding and empowering developers to focus on innovative, high-level problem-solving and the creative aspects of software development. 

‍

And AI plays an increasingly central role in other parts of software development. For example, its pattern recognition and anomaly detection prowess facilitates automated code reviews, where machine-learned parameters help identify code inconsistencies, bugs, or deviations from coding standards. It can also streamline DevOps through intelligent automation. The routine, repetitive facets of DevOps, especially around software deployments, are ripe for AI-driven automation. With intelligent control mechanisms, AI ensures that software deployments are executed seamlessly while safeguarding against accidental deployment anomalies.

‍

The risks and challenges of AI software development

AI in software development promises and these promises are reflected in the vast surge of AI products and tools in recent years. For example, it's estimated that the global AI market will be worth almost $1 trillion by 2028, an almost 10X increase from 2021. 

‍

However, AI software development also promises a good dose of hurdles. The allure of enhanced efficiency and smart automation is undeniable, yet the path is peppered with both predictable and unforeseen challenges. Here's a rundown of six pivotal risks and challenges that come with the AI territory in software development.

‍

Suboptimal code generation‍

AI's code-writing flair, though promising, isn't foolproof. There are times when it can churn out suboptimal or downright erroneous code. Given AI's somewhat green status in tech, human oversight is critical to sifting through and ensuring the code is up to snuff.

‍

Security quicksands

The learning algorithms of AI can sometimes be a double-edged sword, especially when it comes to data security. For instance, a mishandled machine learning model could memorize and regurgitate proprietary code, posing a serious security lapse. And let's not forget the potential of malicious exploitation.

‍

Innovation drought

AI is a whiz at pattern recognition and mundane tasks but falls flat when you ask it to think outside the box. Unlike the human brain, AI misses out on the spark of creativity and innovation, often tethered to the bounds of its pre-fed knowledge.

‍

Understanding gap

Sometimes, communicating with AI feels like talking to a wall, especially with complex or nuanced queries. Even with laser-specific prompts, you might find yourself lost in translation, receiving responses that miss the mark.

‍

Quality data dependency

The magic of AI works best with a rich tapestry of quality data. If fed insufficient or biased data, AI's performance takes a nosedive, leading to less-than-stellar development outcomes and possibly, echoing existing biases.

‍

Operational hiccups

Merging AI into existing development flows can be akin to fitting a square peg in a round hole. The shift demands a hefty dose of computational resources, not to mention a solid grasp of managing and maintaining AI systems. It's a steep learning curve that calls for both time and patience.

‍

‍

The case for non-AI software development

Non-AI software development is the classic path that has fueled the digital era from the get-go. And while AI has its merits, traditional software development holds its ground with a blend of reliability, simplicity, and control that's hard to match. Here's a glimpse into the robust advantages of keeping software development AI-free:

‍

Precision and predictability

Non-AI software development is well-charted, bringing a level of predictability to the table. Every line of code has a defined purpose, offering a crystal-clear understanding of how the software operates and interacts with various inputs, ensuring precise and predictable outcomes.

‍

Simplicity

The elegance of non-AI software development lies in its simplicity. It's straightforward, with no learning algorithms lurking in the background. This simplicity makes troubleshooting and updates a less tangled affair, saving time and reducing headaches.

‍

Direct control

With traditional software development, what you code is what you get. There's a direct line between the developer's intent and the software's function, enabling a level of control that's diluted in AI-driven development endeavors.

‍

Lower resource requirements:

Non-AI software development is less demanding on resources, both in terms of computational power and data. It doesn't require the hefty data sets for training or the same level of processing prowess, making it a cost-effective option, especially for small to medium enterprises.

‍

Ease of validation

Validating the functionality and security of non-AI software is a well-trodden path. Established methodologies and tools exist for verification, providing a structured framework to ensure the software is robust and secure.

‍

Skill set availability

The pool of professionals adept in non-AI software development is vast and diverse. This abundance of skill sets ensures that expertise is readily available, making project ramp-up times quicker and less costly.

‍

Immediate functionality

Unlike AI, which often requires a learning phase before becoming fully functional, traditional software is ready to roll post-development. This immediate functionality ensures that projects can be delivered and implemented in a tighter timeframe.

‍

Will AI replace humans in software development?

It's unlikely, and certainly not soon. AI software development is a powerful tool, that, when used correctly can help developers complete projects faster and better meet client needs. And this is precisely why we see more developers using AI tools like GitHub's Copilot, which is powered by OpenAI's GPT-3 model. This model allows for auto-completing code and generating function definitions, reducing mundane coding tasks and expediting the development lifecycle.

‍

However, skeptics highlight the nuances and intricate decision-making human developers embody, which are rooted in years of experience and an understanding of contextual subtleties. The nature of software development often requires an intuitive grasp and a visionary approach to not just solve problems but to anticipate them. These facets are beyond the mechanical and pattern-recognizing capabilities of AI.

‍

Moreover, there's a human touch in understanding client needs, adapting to feedback, and navigating software projects' often complex and politically charged stakeholder landscapes. These interpersonal and cross-functional dynamics demand a level of empathy, negotiation, and relationship-management skills that AI fundamentally lacks.

‍

Additionally, ethical programming decisions, particularly in sensitive areas like privacy, security, and bias mitigation, require human oversight that is deeply entrenched in social values and moral judgments. While AI can follow programmed ethics to a certain extent, the nuanced understanding and moral reasoning in uncharted territories remain a human forte. And without proper oversight from developers, AI can reflect deep-rooted and harmful human biases, ultimately leading to worse software products. 

‍

What's the verdict? The best approach is a symbiotic relationship where AI empowers developers with tools and insights, rather than replacing them entirely.

‍

A human first approach

Utilizing AI tools in software development shaves hours off mundane coding tasks, making processes sleek and smart. Yet, nothing replaces the human touch— the creativity, the understanding, the moral compass that developers bring to a project. Experienced developers know how to wield AI tools to their advantage, blending the best of both worlds to deliver solutions that hit the mark.

‍